Rowe v. Stoddard

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Rowe v. Stoddard

1 Root 447

DecidedAugust 15, 1792

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 447 (Rowe v. Stoddard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowe v. Stoddard, 1 Root 447 (Colo. 1792).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

The grant to the proprietors of the sawmill reserved water for the fulling-mill four days in a week, and said saw-mill to continue so long only as it was kept in repair. The grant under which the plaintiff claims, is of the privilege of the water from the slitting-mill, reserving a sufficiency for the fulling-mill four days in the week, and so as not to prejudice the saw-mill. In case there should not be enough for all three, the extinguishment of the right of the saw-mill falls into and enlarges the right of the slitting-mill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

The grant to the proprietors of the sawmill reserved water for the fulling-mill four days in a week, and said saw-mill to continue so long only as it was kept in repair. The grant under which the plaintiff claims, is of the privilege of the water from the slitting-mill, reserving a sufficiency for the fulling-mill four days in the week, and so as not to prejudice the saw-mill. In case there should not be enough for all three, the extinguishment of the right of the saw-mill falls into and enlarges the right of the slitting-mill.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-stoddard-conn-1792.