Rowe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Rowe v. State

1931 OK CR 289, 300 P. 428, 51 Okla. Crim. 185, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 271

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 12, 1931

DocketNo. A-8093.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 289 (Rowe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowe v. State, 1931 OK CR 289, 300 P. 428, 51 Okla. Crim. 185, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 271 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county, on a charge of possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed February 24, 1931. No brief has been filed, and no further appearance has been made. Where no brief is filed and no appearance made, this court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned. An examination of the record shows there are no fundamental or prejudicial errors.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVENPORT, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county, on a charge of possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The appeal in this case was filed February 24, 1931. No brief has been filed, and no further appearance has been made. Where no brief is filed and no appearance made, this court will consider the appeal is without merit or has been abandoned. An examination of the record shows there are no fundamental or prejudicial errors.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

CHAPPELL and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 289, 300 P. 428, 51 Okla. Crim. 185, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.