Rowe v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rowe v. State

231 S.E.2d 777, 238 Ga. 153, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 936

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 6, 1977

Docket31383; 31384

StatusPublished

This text of 231 S.E.2d 777 (Rowe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowe v. State, 231 S.E.2d 777, 238 Ga. 153, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 936 (Ga. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Gunter, Justice.

The appellants Rowe and Stenson appeal from their convictions for having committed an armed robbery.

Rowe contends here that the evidence adduced before the jury was insufficient to sustain his conviction, and he [154]*154also contends that the trial court’s charge on the issue of alibi was erroneous. A review of the transcript of evidence and of the charge of the court shows these two enumerated errors wholly without merit.

Submitted July 30, 1976 — Decided January 6, 1977. Robert C. Ray, for appellants. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, for appellee.

Stenson asserts the same two alleged errors, and he additionally contends that a motion for a mistrial made in his behalf during the trial was erroneously denied by the trial judge. Stenson’s three enumerated errors are likewise without merit.

Judgments affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI