Rowe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rowe v. State

880 So. 2d 786, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 2004 WL 1530825

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rowe v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 839 So. 2d 916 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 9, 2004·No. No. 5D04-1627·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rowe seeks a belated appeal of her criminal conviction and sentence. She alleges her privately-retained counsel failed to file a timely notice of appeal on her behalf. However, her petition, as filed, is defective because she did not allege that she requested counsel to file an appeal on her behalf within the time limits. Accordingly, we deny her petition without prejudice to file another petition which complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

DENIED without prejudice.

SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rowe seeks a belated appeal of her criminal conviction and sentence. She alleges her privately-retained counsel failed to file a timely notice of appeal on her behalf. However, her petition, as filed, is defective because she did not allege that she requested counsel to file an appeal on her behalf within the time limits. Accordingly, we deny her petition without prejudice to file another petition which complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

DENIED without prejudice.

SHARP, W„ GRIFFIN and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Rowe v. State, 880 So. 2d 786, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 10093, 2004 WL 1530825 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

880 So. 2d 786 (Rowe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.