Rowe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rowe v. State

626 So. 2d 257, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9872, 1993 WL 383504

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 1, 1993

DocketNo. 92-04075

StatusPublished

This text of 626 So. 2d 257 (Rowe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowe v. State, 626 So. 2d 257, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9872, 1993 WL 383504 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s sentence is before this court for the third time on appeal. He contends the habitual offender sentence imposed upon remand is improper because the trial [258]*258court once again faded to make specific findings of fact to satisfy section 775.084(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1987). Although the trial court’s findings made on remand are conclu-sory, the record provides ample support for the trial court’s conclusions and allows meaningful appellate review. We therefore affirm the appellant’s sentence as a habitual felony-offender. See McClain v. State, 356 So.2d 1256 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s sentence is before this court for the third time on appeal. He contends the habitual offender sentence imposed upon remand is improper because the trial [258]*258court once again faded to make specific findings of fact to satisfy section 775.084(3)(d), Florida Statutes (1987). Although the trial court’s findings made on remand are conclu-sory, the record provides ample support for the trial court’s conclusions and allows meaningful appellate review. We therefore affirm the appellant’s sentence as a habitual felony-offender. See McClain v. State, 356 So.2d 1256 (Fla.2d DCA 1978).

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

626 So. 2d 257, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 9872, 1993 WL 383504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack