Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Rowe v. State

Rowe v. State

260 So. 2d 501, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3882
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 29, 1972·No. No. 41491·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and DREW, J. (Retired), concur. ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowe v. State, 260 So. 2d 501, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3882 (Fla. 1972).

260 So. 2d 501 (Rowe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preston v. State
260 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)