Rowe v. State

260 So. 2d 501, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3882
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 29, 1972
DocketNo. 41491
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 So. 2d 501 (Rowe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowe v. State, 260 So. 2d 501, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3882 (Fla. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. After argument and upon further consideration, we have determined the writ was improvidently issued. The writ must be and is discharged and the petition is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., and DREW, J. (Retired), concur. ERVIN and DEKLE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Preston v. State
260 So. 2d 501 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 So. 2d 501, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-state-fla-1972.