Rowe v. Phelps

152 U.S. 87, 14 S. Ct. 632, 38 L. Ed. 365, 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2096
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 5, 1894
Docket237
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 152 U.S. 87 (Rowe v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowe v. Phelps, 152 U.S. 87, 14 S. Ct. 632, 38 L. Ed. 365, 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2096 (1894).

Opinion

Me. Justice Brown,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no assignment of errors sent up with the record in this case, as required by Bev. Stat. § 997, and no “ specification of the errors relied upon,” as required by Bule 21 of this court. This rule requires that the specification “ shall set out separately and particularly each' error assigned and intended to be urged,” and there is no such “plain error not assigned or specified,” as calls upon the court to exercise its option to review the questions involved. It would seem that unless the statute and rule are to be entirely disregarded, this writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Block
89 F.2d 801 (District of Columbia, 1937)
Hanson v. C. B. & Q. R. R.
213 P. 763 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1923)
Bernard v. Lea
210 F. 583 (Fourth Circuit, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 U.S. 87, 14 S. Ct. 632, 38 L. Ed. 365, 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-phelps-scotus-1894.