Rowe v. Phelps

152 U.S. 87, 14 S. Ct. 632, 38 L. Ed. 365, 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2096
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 5, 1894·No. 237·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Me. Justice Brown,

after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

There is no assignment of errors sent up with the record in this case, as required by Bev. Stat. § 997, and no “ specification of the errors relied upon,” as required by Bule 21 of this court. This rule requires that the specification “ shall set out separately and particularly each' error assigned and intended to be urged,” and there is no such “plain error not assigned or specified,” as calls upon the court to exercise its option to review the questions involved. It would seem that unless the statute and rule are to be entirely disregarded, this writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowe v. Phelps, 152 U.S. 87, 14 S. Ct. 632, 38 L. Ed. 365, 1894 U.S. LEXIS 2096 (1894).

152 U.S. 87 (Rowe v. Phelps) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Block
89 F.2d 801 (District of Columbia, 1937)
Hanson v. C. B. & Q. R. R.
213 P. 763 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1923)
Bernard v. Lea
210 F. 583 (Fourth Circuit, 1913)