Rowe v. Goldsboro Wayne Transportation Authority
This text of 628 F. App'x 183 (Rowe v. Goldsboro Wayne Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Mary Rowe appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Goldsboro Wayne Transportation Authori[184]*184ty on her claim of retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp.2015). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rowe v. Goldsboro Wayne Transp. Auth., No. 5:13-cv-00754-F, 2015 WL 3650086 (E.D.N.C. June 11, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
628 F. App'x 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-goldsboro-wayne-transportation-authority-ca4-2016.