Rowe v. Director, Department of Corrections
This text of 16 F. App'x 229 (Rowe v. Director, Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Brian Lee Rowe seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rowe v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-99-457 (E.D.Va. Mar. 17, 2000 & Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because *230 the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 F. App'x 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-director-department-of-corrections-ca4-2001.