Rowe v. Director, Department of Corrections

16 F. App'x 229
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 15, 2001·No. 01-6559·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Lee Rowe seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rowe v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-99-457 (E.D.Va. Mar. 17, 2000 & Mar. 8, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because *230 the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rowe v. Director, Department of Corrections, 16 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2001).

16 F. App'x 229 (Rowe v. Director, Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rowe v. Director, Department of Corrections
111 F. App'x 150 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)