Rowe v. Coopey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rowe v. Coopey

14 A.2d 76, 339 Pa. 105, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 595

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 8, 1940

DocketAppeal, 122

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 A.2d 76 (Rowe v. Coopey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowe v. Coopey, 14 A.2d 76, 339 Pa. 105, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 595 (Pa. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, engaged in selling ice at retail from Ms truck, headed westward but parked between intersections on the north side of a street 18 feet between curbs, was struck as he was stepping from behind his truck across the street. Defendant’s car was proceeding eastward. The learned trial judge entered a nonsuit which the court subsequently refused to take off in an opinion sufficiently disposing of the suit.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, engaged in selling ice at retail from Ms truck, headed westward but parked between intersections on the north side of a street 18 feet between curbs, was struck as he was stepping from behind his truck across the street. Defendant’s car was proceeding eastward. The learned trial judge entered a nonsuit which the court subsequently refused to take off in an opinion sufficiently disposing of the suit.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 A.2d 76, 339 Pa. 105, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-coopey-pa-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack