Rowe v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 2024
Docket8:24-cv-01430
StatusUnknown

This text of Rowe v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Rowe v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowe v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, (M.D. Fla. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

KENNETH ROWE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:24-cv-1430-CPT

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant. ______________________________________/

O R D E R Before the Court is Defendant Commissioner’s unopposed motion to remand this action pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 16). According to the Commissioner, such a remand is necessary “for further administrative proceedings” and is not contested by the Plaintiff. Id. The Commissioner also represents that, on remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the administrative law judge to “(1) reassess the opinion evidence; (2) take any further action needed to complete the administrative record; and (3) issue a new decision.” Id. Sentence four of section 405(g) provides that a “court shall have [the] power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner . . . with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). In a sentence four remand, the appropriate procedure is for a court to enter a final judgment in the claimant’s favor. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296-97 (1993); Jackson v. Chater, 99 F.3d 1086, 1095 (11th Cir. 1996). In light of the above, it is hereby ORDERED: 1. The Commissioner’s motion (Doc. 16) is granted. 2. The Commissioner’s decision is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings before the Social Security Administration consistent with this Order. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment in the Plaintiffs favor, to terminate any pending motions, and to close the case. SO ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, this 1st day of October 2024.

Nie adios Ack HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER P. TUITE United States Magistrate Judge Copies to: Counsel of record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rowe v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-commissioner-of-the-social-security-administration-flmd-2024.