Rowe v. City of Clearwater
755 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1998 WL 568072
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 9, 1998
DocketNo. 97-4270
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 755 So. 2d 137 (Rowe v. City of Clearwater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rowe v. City of Clearwater, 755 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1998 WL 568072 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
REVERSED. Acker v. City of Clearwater, 755 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). We certify the following question:
WHERE AN EMPLOYER TAKES A WORKERS’ COMPENSATION OFFSET UNDER SECTION 440.20(15), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), AND INITIALLY INCLUDES SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS PAID UNDER SECTION 440.15(l)(e)(l), FLORIDA STATUTES (1985), IS THE EMPLOYER ENTITLED TO RECALCULATE THE OFFSET BASED ON THE YEARLY 5% INCREASE IN SUPPLEMENTAL BENEFITS?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Clearwater v. Acker
755 So. 2d 597 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
HRS DIST. II v. Pickard
778 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
755 So. 2d 137, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11408, 1998 WL 568072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-v-city-of-clearwater-fladistctapp-1998.