Rowe-Linn v. Berman
This text of 601 So. 2d 618 (Rowe-Linn v. Berman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition is granted. Although we do not issue a writ of prohibition, we are confident respondent will promptly disqualify himself, and the circuit court will assign the case below to another judge.
While we do not think the motion for disqualification was legally sufficient, we fear the respondent stepped over the line in the order of denial by failing to “limit his inquiry to a determination of the sufficiency of the motion to disqualify,” and attempting “to justify denial of the motion for reasons other than ... legal sufficiency.” Fruehe v. Reasbeck, 525 So.2d 471, 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). See also cases cited therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
601 So. 2d 618, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7267, 1992 WL 139215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowe-linn-v-berman-fladistctapp-1992.