Rowand v. Germantown Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Rowand v. Germantown Trust Co.

93 A. 1070, 248 Pa. 341, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 573

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 1, 1915

DocketAppeal, No. 109

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 93 A. 1070 (Rowand v. Germantown Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rowand v. Germantown Trust Co., 93 A. 1070, 248 Pa. 341, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 573 (Pa. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question of the liability of the estate of James P. Fleming for the injuries sustained by the appellee depends upon whether Maxwell was a mere interloper when he took charge of the automobile of the decedent or had been put in charge of it by the latter. This was a pure question of fact for the jury, and, as there was testimony that Fleming had placed him in charge of his [343]*343car, describing him to a bystander as an experienced chauffeur, the verdict was justified.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question of the liability of the estate of James P. Fleming for the injuries sustained by the appellee depends upon whether Maxwell was a mere interloper when he took charge of the automobile of the decedent or had been put in charge of it by the latter. This was a pure question of fact for the jury, and, as there was testimony that Fleming had placed him in charge of his [343]*343car, describing him to a bystander as an experienced chauffeur, the verdict was justified.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 A. 1070, 248 Pa. 341, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowand-v-germantown-trust-co-pa-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack