Rowan v. Merritt
9 Wend. 443
This text of 9 Wend. 443 (Rowan v. Merritt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rowan v. Merritt, 9 Wend. 443 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
Opinion
The default was irregularly entered ; the defendants were not bound to serve the peremptory order for any purpose but to non-pross the plaintiff. The portion of the original order that in the meantime all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff stay, continues and is operative until the delivery of the bill of particulars, if a peremptory order be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Fassett v. Dorr
11 N.Y. 177 (New York Supreme Court, 1834)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Wend. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowan-v-merritt-nysupct-1832.