Rowan v. Merritt
9 Wend. 443
Opinion
The default was irregularly entered ; the defendants were not bound to serve the peremptory order for any purpose but to non-pross the plaintiff. The portion of the original order that in the meantime all proceedings on the part of the plaintiff stay, continues and is operative until the delivery of the bill of particulars, if a peremptory order be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rowan v. Merritt, 9 Wend. 443 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1832).
9 Wend. 443 (Rowan v. Merritt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fassett v. Dorr
11 N.Y. 177 (New York Supreme Court, 1834)