Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane

553 A.2d 616, 210 Conn. 802, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 408
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 20, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 553 A.2d 616 (Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane, 553 A.2d 616, 210 Conn. 802, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 408 (Colo. 1988).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition and the plaintiffs cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 71, are granted, limited to the following issues:

Lawrence D. Church, in support of the petition. Mark F. Katz, in opposition. Decided December 20, 1988

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the plaintiffs objection to the report of the trial referee was untimely?

“2. If the objection was untimely, was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that plenary review of the plaintiffs objection was nonetheless warranted?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane
549 A.2d 1085 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 A.2d 616, 210 Conn. 802, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rowan-construction-corp-v-hassane-conn-1988.