Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane

553 A.2d 616, 210 Conn. 802, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 408

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 Conn. 337 →

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 20, 1988·Published

Opinion

The defendant’s petition and the plaintiffs cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 71, are granted, limited to the following issues:

Lawrence D. Church, in support of the petition. Mark F. Katz, in opposition. Decided December 20, 1988

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the plaintiffs objection to the report of the trial referee was untimely?

“2. If the objection was untimely, was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that plenary review of the plaintiffs objection was nonetheless warranted?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition and the plaintiffs cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 71, are granted, limited to the following issues:

Lawrence D. Church, in support of the petition. Mark F. Katz, in opposition. Decided December 20, 1988

“1. Was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that the plaintiffs objection to the report of the trial referee was untimely?

“2. If the objection was untimely, was the Appellate Court correct in concluding that plenary review of the plaintiffs objection was nonetheless warranted?”

Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane, 553 A.2d 616, 210 Conn. 802, 1988 Conn. LEXIS 408 (Colo. 1988).

Pincite

553 A.2d 616 (Rowan Construction Corp. v. Hassane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related