Rovinsky, L. v. Lourdesmont/Good Shepherd
This text of Rovinsky, L. v. Lourdesmont/Good Shepherd (Rovinsky, L. v. Lourdesmont/Good Shepherd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
LISA ROVINSKY AND JOSEPH : No. 527 MAL 2015 ROVINSKY, : : Petitioners : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court : v. : : : LOURDESMONT/GOOD SHEPHERD : YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, : SISTERS OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD : PROVINCE OF MID-NORTH AMERICA, : METZ & ASSOCIATES, LTD, AND METZ : CULINARY MANAGEMENT, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rovinsky, L. v. Lourdesmont/Good Shepherd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rovinsky-l-v-lourdesmontgood-shepherd-pa-2015.