Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided October 3, 2019·No. 19-1129·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ROVI GUIDES, INC., Appellant

v.

COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Appellee ______________________

2019-1129, 2019-1131 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017- 00866, IPR2017-00867. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

KRISTINA CAGGIANO KELLY, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JASON DANIEL EISENBERG, MICHAEL E. JOFFRE, BYRON LEROY PICKARD, JON WRIGHT.

DAVID LISSON, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by FREDERIC MEEKER, JOHN R. HUTCHINS, BLAIR A. SILVER, BRADLEY CHARLES WRIGHT, Banner & Witcoff, Ltd., Washington, DC; GINGER ANDERS, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Washington, DC. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 3, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, (Fed. Cir. 2019).

Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications (Rovi Guides, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.