Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark

225 So. 3d 1063, 2017 WL 3903002

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 6, 2017·No. 2017-CC-1336·Published

Opinion

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 19th JUDICIAL. DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

Stay denied. Writ denied.

Hughes, J.,

additionally concurs with reasons.

_JjI concur in the writ denial. Applicant does not provide a copy of Rover’s petition which would show by what authority it is alleged the lease was signed on behalf of Community. The proper procedural vehicle to resolve the evidentiary issues involved is a motion for summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 19th JUDICIAL. DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

Stay denied. Writ denied.

Hughes, J.,

additionally concurs with reasons.

_JjI concur in the writ denial. Applicant does not provide a copy of Rover’s petition which would show by what authority it is alleged the lease was signed on behalf of Community. The proper procedural vehicle to resolve the evidentiary issues involved is a motion for summary judgment.

Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark, 225 So. 3d 1063, 2017 WL 3903002 (La. 2017).

Pincite

225 So. 3d 1063 (Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.