Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark

225 So. 3d 1063, 2017 WL 3903002

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 6, 2017

Docket2017-CC-1336

StatusPublished

This text of 225 So. 3d 1063 (Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rover Group, Inc. v. Clark, 225 So. 3d 1063, 2017 WL 3903002 (La. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 19th JUDICIAL. DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

Stay denied. Writ denied.

Hughes, J.,

additionally concurs with reasons.

_JjI concur in the writ denial. Applicant does not provide a copy of Rover’s petition which would show by what authority it is alleged the lease was signed on behalf of Community. The proper procedural vehicle to resolve the evidentiary issues involved is a motion for summary judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE 19th JUDICIAL. DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

Stay denied. Writ denied.

Hughes, J.,

additionally concurs with reasons.

_JjI concur in the writ denial. Applicant does not provide a copy of Rover’s petition which would show by what authority it is alleged the lease was signed on behalf of Community. The proper procedural vehicle to resolve the evidentiary issues involved is a motion for summary judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 So. 3d 1063, 2017 WL 3903002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rover-group-inc-v-clark-la-2017.