Rouzard v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
DIANSKY ROUZARD,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 6:24-cv-585-CEM-LHP
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant
ORDER This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC (E-FILING) ACCESS (Doc. No. 8) FILED: May 24, 2024
THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED without prejudice. The motion fails to comply with the Local Rules, including Local Rules 1.08, 3.01(a), and 3.01(g). Further, pursuant to this Court’s Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing, a party proceeding pro se is required to file all pleadings and other documents in paper format, absent authorization from the Court to file electronically.'_ “While an unrepresented individual may obtain the □□□□□□□ permission to file his submissions electronically using the CM/ECF system, such authorization is typically denied unless the pro se party makes a showing of good cause or extenuating circumstances justifying such relief.” Hooker v. Wilkie, No. 8:20-cv-1248-T-02-CPT, 2020 WL 6947482, at *1 (M.D. Fla. June 4, 2020) (citations omitted). The instant motion (Doc. No. 8) is not sufficient to satisfy this standard. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on May 29, 2024.
LESLIE NOFFMAN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties
1 The Court’s Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing can be found on the Court’s website, www.flmd-uscourts.gov, under “Filing a Case” and then selecting “Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing (PDF).” _2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rouzard v. Commissioner of Social Security (Rouzard v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.