Roux v. Witzmann

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Roux v. Witzmann

7 Teiss. 233

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 10, 1910

DocketNo. 4756

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Teiss. 233 (Roux v. Witzmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roux v. Witzmann, 7 Teiss. 233 (La. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

ST. PAUL, J.

The question of law involved in this case is certified to the Supreme Court.

February 9, 1910.

ST. PAUL, J. — This case was certified to the Supreme Court, and the question submitted whether under Act 68 of 1908 the holder and discounter of the note sued on can recover the face .value thereof notwithstanding that the note had been discounted at a higher rate of interest than 8%.

That Court answered that “the note sued on is not usurious. ” This entitles plaintiff to an affirmance of the judgment appealed from.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ST. PAUL, J.

The question of law involved in this case is certified to the Supreme Court.

February 9, 1910.

ST. PAUL, J. — This case was certified to the Supreme Court, and the question submitted whether under Act 68 of 1908 the holder and discounter of the note sued on can recover the face .value thereof notwithstanding that the note had been discounted at a higher rate of interest than 8%.

That Court answered that “the note sued on is not usurious. ” This entitles plaintiff to an affirmance of the judgment appealed from.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Teiss. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roux-v-witzmann-lactapp-1910.