Routenberg v. State
This text of 721 So. 2d 1187 (Routenberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William ROUTENBERG, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Walter L. Grantham, Jr., Clearwater, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and J. Andrew Meyer, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
William Routenberg appeals the sentence imposed following this court's prior remand for resentencing pursuant to the appropriate guidelines. See Routenberg v. State, 677 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). On remand, Routenberg was sentenced to seventeen years' imprisonment followed by life probation for sexual battery, a life felony. Routenberg maintains, and the State concedes, that his total sentence cannot exceed forty years, the maximum amount for a life felony sentenced as a term of years. See § 775.082(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). Because the total of the incarcerative and probationary periods of Routenberg's sentence exceeded forty years, it was an illegal sentence.
The sentence is reversed and this matter is remanded for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
THREADGILL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
721 So. 2d 1187, 1998 WL 746065, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/routenberg-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.