Home/California Court of Appeal/Rousseau v. Tobin

Rousseau v. Tobin

307 P.2d 378, 148 Cal. App. 2d 972, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 2462
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 26, 1957
DocketCiv. No. 16987
StatusPublished

This text of 307 P.2d 378 (Rousseau v. Tobin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rousseau v. Tobin, 307 P.2d 378, 148 Cal. App. 2d 972, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 2462 (Cal. Ct. App. 1957).

Opinion

DOOLING, Acting P. J.

This case is similar to Rousseau v. O’Gara, No. 17019, ante, p. 676 [307 P.2d 376], this day decided. Respondents are attorneys who represented parties adverse to appellant in the prior action, Rousseau v. Hurtado, 122 Cal.App.2d 705 [265 P.2d 580], The amended complaint contains allegations similar to those found in the O’Gara case. Respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. For the reasons given in our opinion in that case the judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Kaufman, J., and Draper, J. pro tem.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rousseau v. O'Gara
307 P.2d 376 (California Court of Appeal, 1957)
Rousseau v. Hurtado
265 P.2d 580 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 P.2d 378, 148 Cal. App. 2d 972, 1957 Cal. App. LEXIS 2462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rousseau-v-tobin-calctapp-1957.