Rousseau v. Democratic Parish Executive Committee

165 So. 166, 183 La. 965, 1935 La. LEXIS 1791
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 2, 1935·No. Nos. 33736, 33735.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

HIGGINS, Justice.

If a strict interpretation is placed upon the language of the Primary Election Law (Act No. 97 of 1922, as amended), and the notice of intention to become a candidate and the affidavit accompanying the notice are considered in that light, the candidate has not properly qualified. But, in the previous decisions of this court, we have repeatedly said that, since the right of the people to choose their public officials is indirectly affected, and this being the fundamental principle involved in all elections, a liberal construction should be placed upon the provisions of the statute.

The Court of Appeal treated the case in a liberal manner, which was in accordance with the announced policy of this court. Therefore, its judgment is correct and the writs are refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rousseau v. Democratic Parish Executive Committee, 165 So. 166, 183 La. 965, 1935 La. LEXIS 1791 (La. 1935).

165 So. 166 (Rousseau v. Democratic Parish Executive Committee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wall v. Democratic Representative District Committee for District 15
317 So. 2d 308 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1975)
Brown v. Democratic Parish Committee
165 So. 167 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1935)
Rousseau v. Democratic Parish Executive Committee
164 So. 175 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1935)