Roushia v. Harvey

276 A.D.2d 970, 714 N.Y.S.2d 800, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10799
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 26, 2000·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Cardona, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Dawson, J.), entered June 2, 1999 in Clinton County, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

In 1992, plaintiff began working as an independent owner/ truck driver for defendant Harvey & Company, Inc. (hereinafter defendant). In June 1995, he purchased a 1996 Peterbilt tractor for the sum of $98,000 paying $10,500 as a downpayment. Defendant, through a third party, financed the balance of the purchase price and retained legal title to the tractor. Plaintiff made monthly loan payments of $1,900 to defendant through weekly deductions from his wages. In September 1997, plaintiff ceased working for defendant. Defendant’s president, defendant Olen Harvey, demanded that plaintiff pay approximately $5,000 he claimed was owed on the tractor. In the event that was not done, Harvey indicated it would be seized. [971]*971When plaintiff refused, Harvey removed the tractor from plaintiffs property.

In October 1997, plaintiff commenced this action seeking, inter alia, a determination vesting him with legal title to the tractor and an order restraining defendant from disposing of it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roushia v. Harvey, 276 A.D.2d 970, 714 N.Y.S.2d 800, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

276 A.D.2d 970 (Roushia v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

BAJRIC, VEHDIN v. HETO, FARUK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Bajric v. Estate of Heto
115 A.D.3d 1356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Overocker v. Madigan
113 A.D.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)