Roush v. Russell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Roush v. Russell

63 N.E. 314, 28 Ind. App. 699, 1902 Ind. App. LEXIS 93

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 1902

DocketNo. 3,530

StatusPublished

This text of 63 N.E. 314 (Roush v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roush v. Russell, 63 N.E. 314, 28 Ind. App. 699, 1902 Ind. App. LEXIS 93 (Ind. Ct. App. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Black, J.

The appellees brought their action to recover possession of land from the appellant, their tenant holding over. The only question presented here relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict for the appellees. Evidence introduced on behalf of the appellees fully supported the verdict, and the appellant can derive no benefit on appeal from his evidence of a contrary tendency. The conflict of evidence determined in the trial court can not be opened up and again decided here.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Black, J.

The appellees brought their action to recover possession of land from the appellant, their tenant holding over. The only question presented here relates to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict for the appellees. Evidence introduced on behalf of the appellees fully supported the verdict, and the appellant can derive no benefit on appeal from his evidence of a contrary tendency. The conflict of evidence determined in the trial court can not be opened up and again decided here.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 N.E. 314, 28 Ind. App. 699, 1902 Ind. App. LEXIS 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roush-v-russell-indctapp-1902.