Rouse v. Walden
This text of Rouse v. Walden (Rouse v. Walden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 19-JUL-2018 08:29 AM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
LEON R. ROUSE, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
ANDREW R. WALDEN, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIVIL NO. 15-1-0995)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate
Court of Appeals at the time the application for a writ of
certiorari was filed, see Hawaii Revised Statutes § 602-59
(2016); see also Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (“HRAP”)
Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Plaintiff-
Appellant Leon R. Rouse’s application for a writ of certiorari,
filed on July 13, 2018, is dismissed without prejudice to re-
filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2016)
(“The application shall be filed within 30 days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or
dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is
extended in accordance with this Rule.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, July 19, 2018.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rouse v. Walden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rouse-v-walden-haw-2018.