Rouse v. Texas Capital Bank, N.A.

391 S.W.3d 679, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 983, 2013 WL 398898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rouse v. Texas Capital Bank, N.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 9371
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 31, 2013·No. No. 05-13-00050-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice WRIGHT.

Before the Court is the January 18, 2013 joint motion to set aside appealed part of judgment pursuant to settlement. In the motion, the parties state they have settled all claims between them. The parties also state, and our records show, that TriCounty Autoplex was a party in the trial court, but did not perfect an appeal. We grant the parties’ joint motion, and pursuant to the parties request, set aside without regard to the merits the portion of the judgment that awards damages and in-junctive relief against Rouse, and remand that portion of the judgment to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement.

See Tex.R.App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rouse v. Texas Capital Bank, N.A., 391 S.W.3d 679, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 983, 2013 WL 398898 (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

391 S.W.3d 679 (Rouse v. Texas Capital Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.