Rouse v. Tennis

Fourth Circuit

Rouse v. Tennis

117 F. App'x 877

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2004·No. No. 04-7083·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr. appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rouse v. Tennis, No. CA-03-739-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Gerry Lee Rouse, Sr. appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rouse v. Tennis, No. CA-03-739-2 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Rouse v. Tennis, 117 F. App'x 877 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

117 F. App'x 877 (Rouse v. Tennis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related