Rouse v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rouse v. State

652 So. 2d 966, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3472, 1995 WL 144480

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rouse v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 643 So. 2d 696 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 1995·No. No. 93-03022·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Judith Rouse’s conviction for carrying a concealed firearm; however, we must remand this case to the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect that Judith Rouse was tried by a jury and found guilty of the crime. The judgment incorrectly states that Rouse entered a plea of guilty.

Remanded for correction of the judgment.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Judith Rouse’s conviction for carrying a concealed firearm; however, we must remand this case to the trial court to correct the judgment to reflect that Judith Rouse was tried by a jury and found guilty of the crime. The judgment incorrectly states that Rouse entered a plea of guilty.

Remanded for correction of the judgment.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Rouse v. State, 652 So. 2d 966, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 3472, 1995 WL 144480 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

652 So. 2d 966 (Rouse v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.