Rouse v. Old Colony Insurance
This text of 166 S.E. 177 (Rouse v. Old Colony Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The decisions of this Court are to the effect that the contractual limitation of twelve months in which to bring suit, inserted in a fire insurance policy by virtue of C. S., 6437, is valid and binding. Holly v. London Assurance Co., 170 N. C., 4, 86 S. E., 694; Tatham v. Insurance Co., 181 N. C., 434, 107 S. E., 450.
The cause of action is laid upon the policy, and it is manifest that the suit cannot be maintained.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 S.E. 177, 203 N.C. 345, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rouse-v-old-colony-insurance-nc-1932.