Rouse v. Fletcher
This text of 20 F. Cas. 1264 (Rouse v. Fletcher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause being brought on for hearing upon the pleadings and stipulations of counsel, and both parties thereto appearing by their respective counsel, the court doth find: 1st That the letters patent No. 130.S71, granted to Roswell R. Rouse, the complainant herein, on the 27th day of August 1S72, for improvement in well-tubes, and the reissued letters patent No. 6,327. granted to Louis M. Rum-Bey and Moses Ruinsey, on the 16th day of March, 1875, as a reissue of the letters patent I No. 4!i.L2i)|. originally granted to John M. May, August 1, 18G5. for improvement in drills for well-boring, are good and valid in law. 2d. That this complainant is the sole and exclusive owner of all rights created, conferred, or secured by said reissued letters patent respectively, in and for the county of Marion, and state of Indiana. 3d. [1265]*1265That these defendants have infringed and violated said reissued letters patent respectively, by using, in the construction and operation of certain wells in Indianapolis, within said Marion county, well-tubes or drills embracing improvements described and claimed in said reissued letters patent.
It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed: 1st. That these defendants, their servants, agents, ana attorneys, be, and they hereby are, enjoined from malting, using, or selling, other well-tubes or drills similar to that heretofore used by them, or to those described and claimed in said reissued letters patent, or from any use of the tubes heretofore purchased and used by them other than in the wells in which they are already sunlt. 2d. That said defendants pay to said complainant, as damages for infringement of said letters patent as aforesaid, and as his royalty for the wells so made-by them, and for the use of said well-tubes in constructing and operating said wells, the sum of twenty-five dollars. 3d. That said defendants pay the costs of this suit, and that in default of the payment of damages and costs, as aforesaid, within sixty days from the entry of this judgment, execution issue therefor.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 F. Cas. 1264, 9 O.G. 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rouse-v-fletcher-circtdin-1876.