Rouse v. City of New York

5 A.D.3d 274, 773 N.Y.S.2d 302, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240

This text of 5 A.D.3d 274 (Rouse v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rouse v. City of New York, 5 A.D.3d 274, 773 N.Y.S.2d 302, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered March 21, 2003, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination denying petitioner’s request to retake a civil service examination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

No issues of fact exist as to whether petitioner complained about the lighting in the examination room on the day he took the examination, and, even if he did, that the alleged excessive glare caused him a disadvantage (see Matter of Lawson v Levitt, 211 AD2d 587 [1995]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawson v. Levitt
211 A.D.2d 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.3d 274, 773 N.Y.S.2d 302, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rouse-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2004.