Rouse-Miami, Inc. v. Robbins
This text of 633 So. 2d 1121 (Rouse-Miami, Inc. v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the final judgment approving the Dade County Property Appraiser’s property valuation, for ad valorem tax purposes, of the property of appellant Rouse-Miami, Inc. “[T]he property appraiser’s determination, having been lawfully arrived at and being supported by a reasonable hypothesis of correctness, was properly upheld.” Blake v. Xerox Corp., 447 So.2d 1348, 1351 (Fla.1984). The taxpayer did not meet its burden of refuting the presumption of correctness that clothes the appraiser’s determination, Blake, 447 So.2d at 1350, and the record supports the trial court’s finding that the property appraiser considered the factors in section 193.011, Florida Statutes (1989) in the appraisal. Schultz v. TM Florida-Ohio Realty Ltd. Partnership, 577 So.2d 573 (Fla.[1122]*11221991); Valencia Center, Inc. v. Bystrom, 543 So.2d 214 (Fla.1989); Blake.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
633 So. 2d 1121, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1666, 1994 WL 59440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rouse-miami-inc-v-robbins-fladistctapp-1994.