Rousak v. Rudnick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rousak v. Rudnick

239 A.D. 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D. 885 (Rousak v. Rudnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rousak v. Rudnick, 239 A.D. 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinions

Judgment reversed as to both plaintiffs and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff, Minnie Rousak stipulates to reduce the judgment as entered in her favor to the sum of $7,685.36, and plaintiff, Paul Rousak, stipulates to reduce the judgment as entered in his favor to $1,000, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.; Martin, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed as to both plaintiffs and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff, Minnie Rousak stipulates to reduce the judgment as entered in her favor to the sum of $7,685.36, and plaintiff, Paul Rousak, stipulates to reduce the judgment as entered in his favor to $1,000, in which event the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.; Martin, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rousak-v-rudnick-nyappdiv-1933.