Rous v. Carlisle
50 N.E.2d 250, 290 N.Y. 869, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1451
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis and Desmond, JJ. Conway, J., dissents upon the ground that a cause of action is stated in paragraphs 71 to 81 inclusive of the amended complaint. Taking no part: Finch, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rous v. Carlisle, 50 N.E.2d 250, 290 N.Y. 869, 1943 N.Y. LEXIS 1451 (N.Y. 1943).
50 N.E.2d 250 (Rous v. Carlisle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
K.M.L. Laboratories Ltd. v. Hopper
830 F. Supp. 159 (E.D. New York, 1993)
Kamin v. American Express Co.
86 Misc. 809 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)
Sylvia Martin Foundation, Inc. v. Swearingen
260 F. Supp. 231 (S.D. New York, 1966)
Gilbert v. Case
17 Misc. 2d 1061 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Sorin v. Sharmoon
3 Misc. 2d 953 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Weiss
110 N.E.2d 397 (New York Court of Appeals, 1953)
Rosenfield v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.
276 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)
Abrams v. Allen
271 A.D.2d 326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)