Rourke v. Duffy
15 Abb. Pr. 340
This text of 15 Abb. Pr. 340 (Rourke v. Duffy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rourke v. Duffy, 15 Abb. Pr. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1862).
Opinion
held that the words “ would be satisfied,” meant that the respondent would accept the affidavit in satisfaction of the debt; that the appellant was not bound to surrender the affidavit; and that it was a bar to the action.
Judgment reversed.
Present, Daly, F. J., Brady and Hilton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 Abb. Pr. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rourke-v-duffy-nyctcompl-1862.