Rourke v. Duffy
15 Abb. Pr. 340
Opinion
held that the words “ would be satisfied,” meant that the respondent would accept the affidavit in satisfaction of the debt; that the appellant was not bound to surrender the affidavit; and that it was a bar to the action.
Judgment reversed.
Present, Daly, F. J., Brady and Hilton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rourke v. Duffy, 15 Abb. Pr. 340 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1862).
15 Abb. Pr. 340 (Rourke v. Duffy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.