Rourke v. Domestic Sewing Machine Co.

2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 359
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedMay 15, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 359 (Rourke v. Domestic Sewing Machine Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rourke v. Domestic Sewing Machine Co., 2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 359 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

McAdam, Ch. J.

The defendant obtained an order requiring the plaintiff to file security for costs, with a stay of all his proceedings in the mean time. The plaintiff now moves for leave to discontinue. The stay does not prevent this. The application is not aggressive, .but in the nature of a petition to the court for relief. The plaintiff cannot comply with its order, and asks leave to retire from the litigation. He should be permitted to do this on payment of the taxable costs (1 Abb. Pr. 46).

Application .for leave to discontinue, on payment of costs, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seaboard & Roanoake R. R. Co. v. Ward
1 Abb. Pr. 46 (New York Supreme Court, 1854)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 N.Y. City Ct. Rep. 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rourke-v-domestic-sewing-machine-co-nynyccityct-1887.