Roure Dupont Mfg., Inc. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 265
United States Customs Court·Decided October 7, 1955·No. No. 59335; protests 176764-K, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cedarwood oil, a distilled or essential oil, not provided for by name in the tariff act, and is not a mixture or combination containing essential or distilled oils, or natural or synthetic odoriferous or aromatic substances, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roure Dupont Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 265 (cusc 1955).
35 Cust. Ct. 265 (Roure Dupont Mfg., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.