Roure Dupont Mfg., Inc. v. United States
35 Cust. Ct. 265
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 7, 1955
DocketNo. 59335; protests 176764-K, etc. (New York)
StatusPublished
This text of 35 Cust. Ct. 265 (Roure Dupont Mfg., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roure Dupont Mfg., Inc. v. United States, 35 Cust. Ct. 265 (cusc 1955).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cedarwood oil, a distilled or essential oil, not provided for by name in the tariff act, and is not a mixture or combination containing essential or distilled oils, or natural or synthetic odoriferous or aromatic substances, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 Cust. Ct. 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roure-dupont-mfg-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1955.