Rountree v. Bond Hedgepeth D/B/A Rb Constr.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMarch 7, 2003
DocketI.C. NO. 182510
StatusPublished

This text of Rountree v. Bond Hedgepeth D/B/A Rb Constr. (Rountree v. Bond Hedgepeth D/B/A Rb Constr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rountree v. Bond Hedgepeth D/B/A Rb Constr., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Opinion

***********
The undersigned have reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Jones. The appealing parties have not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties or their representatives; therefore, the Full Commission AFFIRMS the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner with some modifications.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are bound by and subject to the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. Atlantic Seaboard Corporation is the Statutory Employer and Greenwich Insurance Company is the carrier for the Statutory Employer.

3. Plaintiff's date of injury was July 18, 2001.

4. RB Construction was notified as to plaintiff's injury on July 18, 2001.

5. Plaintiff's medical records were stipulated into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 1.

6. Industrial Commission forms relating to this case were stipulated into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 2.

7. Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories to the defendant RB Construction Company and Builders Mutual Insurance Company were stipulated into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit 3.

8. The issues before the Full Commission are:

(i) Whether Builders Mutual Insurance Company was the carrier on risk for Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction on July 18, 2001;

(ii) Whether plaintiff was an employee of Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction on July 18, 2001;

(iii) If Builders Mutual Insurance Company was not the carrier on risk for Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction on July 18, 2001 was Atlantic Seaboard, plaintiff's statutory employer within the meaning of N.C.G.S. § 97-19 on July 18, 2001;

(iv) Whether Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction regularly employed three (3) or more employees on or about July 18, 2001;

(v) What compensation, if any is due plaintiff;

(vi) Whether plaintiff is entitled to recover attorney's fee from defendant Builders Mutual Insurance Company pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 97-88.1?

9. The depositions of Dennis B. Nicks, M.D. and Kathy Ormsby, MS, OTR/L, CHT are a part of the evidentiary record in this case.

***********
Based upon the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission finds as follows:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. On February 16, 2001, Atlantic Seaboard Corporation through its employee Bond Hedgepeth entered into an agreement with William and Faye Mason for home improvements for their residence. This agreement included refinishing the existing kitchen hardwood floors and installing new drip edge around the perimeter of the roof.

2. On May 3, 2001, Atlantic Seaboard Corporation entered into a contract for additional home improvements at the Mason home for demolishing the existing kitchen floor, installing new joists, plywood and insulation and installing new pre-finished flooring in the kitchen.

3. In May 2001, plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Atlantic Seaboard Corporation through its employee Bond Hedgepeth to perform carpentry and painting work at the Mason residence for $1,000.00. This amount was to be paid at the completion and inspection of work and there were to be no advances. Plaintiff was to furnish all labor, equipment, workers' compensation and pay all taxes. This agreement did not include installing the shoe molding on the kitchen floor or the drip edge around the perimeter of the roof.

4. On June 1, 2001, plaintiff completed the specified work on the Mason residence pursuant to the subcontract with Atlantic Seaboard Corporation. Atlantic Seaboard Corporation issued a check to plaintiff in the amount of $1,000.00 as agreed.

5. After plaintiff had completed the work pursuant to the subcontract, Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction was no longer employed by Atlantic Seaboard Corporation. Mr. Hedgepeth indicated to plaintiff and Kerry Parrish that if plaintiff and Kerry Parrish became employees of Bond Hedgepeth, Hedgepeth would provide job assignments, equipment, workers' compensation insurance and would pay taxes for plaintiff.

6. Plaintiff and Kerry Parrish became employees of Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction. Bond Hedgepeth paid plaintiff and Kerry Parrish in cash instead of by check. As part of the agreement, Bond Hedgepeth provided lodging to plaintiff and Kerry Parrish.

7. Plaintiff was no longer an independent carpenter and/or painter upon being employed by Bond Hedgepeth.

8. On June 19, 2001, Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction began subcontract work for Atlantic Seaboard Corporation at the Mason residence and on other jobs.

9. On June 28, 2001, a certificate of insurance was issued by James Moore Insurance Agency binding Builders Mutual Insurance Company for workers' compensation coverage for Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction. James Moore Agency had the authority to bind Builders Mutual Insurance Company for such coverage. The coverage for Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction was for the period of June 28, 2001 through June 28, 2002.

10. A written policy was issued by Builders Mutual Insurance Company to Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction for the period of June 28, 2001 through June 28, 2002. This policy indicated that if the policy were to be canceled that Builders Mutual Insurance Company must mail deliver written notice that cancellation was to take effect on an exact date not less than ten days in advance of the date such cancellation was to take effect.

11. The check to Builders Mutual Insurance Company from Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction which accompanied the payment for the insurance policy was insufficient.

12. When the check was returned, Builders Mutual Insurance Company did notify James Moore Insurance Agency that payment would be required before August 12, 2001 to avoid cancellation. James Moore Insurance Agency did not immediately notify Bond Hedgepeth about the returned check and possible cancellation. Bond Hedgepeth did not receive notice that payment was required prior to August 12, 2001.

13. On July 18, 2001, Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction directed plaintiff and Kerry Parrish to go to the Mason residence to install shoe molding on the new pre-finished floor in the kitchen and to install drip edge.

14. On July 18, 2001, plaintiff was an employee of Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction receiving $630.00 per week plus lodging worth $50.00 for a total of $680.00 per week.

15. Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction instructed plaintiff where and how to work, had the authority to discharge plaintiff, provided the equipment to plaintiff for the work and regularly employed three (3) or more employees.

16. On July 18, 2001, plaintiff was using a compound miter saw belonging to Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction to cut a piece of shoe molding to install on the new pre-finished floor at the Mason residence. While using the saw, plaintiff amputated his right hand and the saw fell over cutting plaintiff's right leg.

17. Plaintiff was transferred by ambulance to New Hanover Regional Hospital and underwent surgery rendered by Dennis B. Nicks, M.D.

18. Kerry Parrish contacted Bond Hedgepeth d/b/a RB Construction to notify him of plaintiff's accident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 97-19
North Carolina § 97-19
§ 97-2
North Carolina § 97-2(1)
§ 97-25
North Carolina § 97-25
§ 97-29
North Carolina § 97-29
§ 97-42
North Carolina § 97-42
§ 97-88.1
North Carolina § 97-88.1
§ 97-99
North Carolina § 97-99

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rountree v. Bond Hedgepeth D/B/A Rb Constr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rountree-v-bond-hedgepeth-dba-rb-constr-ncworkcompcom-2003.