Rounsaville v. Lamb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Rounsaville v. Lamb

123 S.E. 723, 32 Ga. App. 403, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 421

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 10, 1924

Docket15423

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 723 (Rounsaville v. Lamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rounsaville v. Lamb, 123 S.E. 723, 32 Ga. App. 403, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 421 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodwobth, J.

1. When the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial are considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, there is no error in any of them that requires the grant of a new trial.

2. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jnry; no error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial of the case; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodwobth, J.

1. When the excerpts from the charge of which complaint is made in the motion for a new trial are considered in connection with the remainder of the charge, there is no error in any of them that requires the grant of a new trial.

2. There is some evidence to support the finding of the jnry; no error of law appears to have been committed upon the trial of the case; and the verdict having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 723, 32 Ga. App. 403, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rounsaville-v-lamb-gactapp-1924.