Rounsaville & Brother v. Watters
This text of 20 S.E. 93 (Rounsaville & Brother v. Watters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the plaintiffs contended that the defendant in fi. fa. paid certain amounts on the purchase money of' the lots levied on; that he fraudulently transferred his stock of goods and his interest in said lots, but continued to manage the goods, and from sales thereof used certain amounts in improving the lots. The jury found the property not subject, and plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 S.E. 93, 94 Ga. 707, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rounsaville-brother-v-watters-ga-1894.