Roundy v. Reber

Utah Supreme Court

Roundy v. Reber

422 P.2d 530, 18 Utah 2d 309, 1967 Utah LEXIS 658

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 23, 1967

DocketNo. 10533

StatusPublished

This text of 422 P.2d 530 (Roundy v. Reber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roundy v. Reber, 422 P.2d 530, 18 Utah 2d 309, 1967 Utah LEXIS 658 (Utah 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from an unlawful detainer judgment awarding possession of a home and damages to plaintiff. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.

Defendants’ only point on appeal says Notice to Quit was served after the action was commenced, and hence was ineffective. This is not so. There was a previous case filed, but obviously abandoned. In the instant case, the notice was served on August 17, 196S, and a complaint followed on November 2nd, and under such circumstances defendant cannot assert that the August notice related back to a previously abandoned complaint, — particularly in view of the fact that such urgence was made, not in the record, — but for the first time on appeal.

CALLISTER and TUCKETT, JJ., and ALDON J. ANDERSON, District Judge, concur. CROCKETT, C. J., concurs in the result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENRIOD, Justice:

Appeal from an unlawful detainer judgment awarding possession of a home and damages to plaintiff. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.

Defendants’ only point on appeal says Notice to Quit was served after the action was commenced, and hence was ineffective. This is not so. There was a previous case filed, but obviously abandoned. In the instant case, the notice was served on August 17, 196S, and a complaint followed on November 2nd, and under such circumstances defendant cannot assert that the August notice related back to a previously abandoned complaint, — particularly in view of the fact that such urgence was made, not in the record, — but for the first time on appeal.

CALLISTER and TUCKETT, JJ., and ALDON J. ANDERSON, District Judge, concur. CROCKETT, C. J., concurs in the result.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

422 P.2d 530, 18 Utah 2d 309, 1967 Utah LEXIS 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roundy-v-reber-utah-1967.