Roundtree v. State

320 S.W.3d 242, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235, 2010 WL 3553876
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 14, 2010·No. ED 93595·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Roundtree appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.085 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roundtree v. State, 320 S.W.3d 242, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1235, 2010 WL 3553876 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

320 S.W.3d 242 (Roundtree v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
320 S.W.3d 242 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)