Roundtree v. State

65 So. 125, 107 Miss. 166
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1914·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion for a new trial should have been sustained, so that appellant'might obtain the benefit of the newly discovered testimony, which, if true, will entitle him to an acquittal.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roundtree v. State, 65 So. 125, 107 Miss. 166 (Mich. 1914).

65 So. 125 (Roundtree v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. State
252 So. 2d 217 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1971)
Powers v. State
151 So. 730 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)