Roundtree v. State

65 So. 3d 132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10546, 2011 WL 2622412
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roundtree v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 361
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 6, 2011·No. No. 4D10-1995·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Alvarino, 585 So.2d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that there is no requirement that a [133]*133measuring device used to determine that a drug sale took place within 1,000 feet of a school must be previously calibrated or otherwise independently tested for accuracy).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roundtree v. State, 65 So. 3d 132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10546, 2011 WL 2622412 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

65 So. 3d 132 (Roundtree v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Alvarino
585 So. 2d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)