Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Roundtree v. State

Roundtree v. State

65 So. 3d 132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10546, 2011 WL 2622412
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 6, 2011
DocketNo. 4D10-1995
StatusPublished

This text of 65 So. 3d 132 (Roundtree v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roundtree v. State, 65 So. 3d 132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10546, 2011 WL 2622412 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Alvarino, 585 So.2d 1094, 1095 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding that there is no requirement that a [133]*133measuring device used to determine that a drug sale took place within 1,000 feet of a school must be previously calibrated or otherwise independently tested for accuracy).

TAYLOR, HAZOURI and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Alvarino
585 So. 2d 1094 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 So. 3d 132, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10546, 2011 WL 2622412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roundtree-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.