Round Lake Ass'n v. Kellogg
20 N.Y.S. 261, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 668, 65 Hun 622
Opinions
I have examined this case, and it seems to me it should be affirmed. There have already béen three opinions written in it. On the merits the opinions of Judges Putnam and Tappan strike me as sufficient. The general term opinion was to the propriety of a preliminary injunction, and did not reach the merits. I think the judgment should be affirmed.
Affirmed, without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Round Lake Ass'n v. Kellogg, 20 N.Y.S. 261, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 668, 65 Hun 622 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).
20 N.Y.S. 261 (Round Lake Ass'n v. Kellogg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parucki v. Polish National Catholic Church of the Holy Mother of the Rosary
114 Misc. 6 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)
Duryea v. Hendrickson
175 A.D. 188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)