Round Lake Ass'n v. Kellogg

20 N.Y.S. 261, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 668, 65 Hun 622
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 14, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 N.Y.S. 261 (Round Lake Ass'n v. Kellogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Round Lake Ass'n v. Kellogg, 20 N.Y.S. 261, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 668, 65 Hun 622 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

Opinions

Herrick, J.

I have examined this case, and it seems to me it should be affirmed. There have already béen three opinions written in it. On the merits the opinions of Judges Putnam and Tappan strike me as sufficient. The general term opinion was to the propriety of a preliminary injunction, and did not reach the merits. I think the judgment should be affirmed.

Affirmed, without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duryea v. Hendrickson
175 A.D. 188 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 N.Y.S. 261, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 668, 65 Hun 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/round-lake-assn-v-kellogg-nysupct-1892.