Roulette Blair v. Daniel J. McCarthy
920 F.2d 586, 90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8832, 90 Daily Journal DAR 13702, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20888, 1990 WL 188766
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roulette Blair v. Daniel J. McCarthy. Read the opinion of the Court — 881 F.2d 602 →
Opinion
ORDER
The Supreme Court, _ U.S. _, 111 S.Ct. 377, 112 L.Ed.2d 391 has issued the following order in this case by reason of the litigation having become moot:
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with directions that it instruct the United States District Court for the Central District of California to vacate its order and dismiss the petition for a writ of habeas corpus as moot. United States v. Munsingwear Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950).
*587 The district court is ordered to comply with the direction set forth in the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roulette Blair v. Daniel J. McCarthy, 920 F.2d 586, 90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8832, 90 Daily Journal DAR 13702, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20888, 1990 WL 188766 (9th Cir. 1990).
920 F.2d 586 (Roulette Blair v. Daniel J. McCarthy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Rivera-Feliciano v. United States
498 U.S. 954 (Supreme Court, 1990)