Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.

S.D. Texas

Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.

DecidedDecember 20, 2019

Docket4:17-cv-02399

StatusUnknown

This text of Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc. (Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., (S.D. Tex. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 20, 2015 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION LAWRENCE ROUGIER, et al, § § Plaintiffs, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-2399 § APPLIED OPTOELECTRONICS, INC., et : al, § § Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation (Instrument No. 125) signed by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan on November 13, 2019 regarding Instrument 105. Defendants timely filed objections. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and objections and made a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's recommended dispositions to which objections were raised, Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel P.C. v. Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 855 (Sth Cir. 1991), and after consideration of the applicable law, is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Bryan's Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby adopted by this Court. The Clerk shall enter this Order and provide all parties with a true copy. th - SIGNED on this the day of December, 2019, at Houston, Texas. paola, VANESSA D. GILMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 20, 2015 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bradley, Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION LAWRENCE ROUGIER, et al, § § Plaintiffs, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-2399 § APPLIED OPTOELECTRONICS, INC., et : al, § § Defendants. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation (Instrument No. 125) signed by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan on November 13, 2019 regarding Instrument 105. Defendants timely filed objections. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and objections and made a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's recommended dispositions to which objections were raised, Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel P.C. v. Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 855 (Sth Cir. 1991), and after consideration of the applicable law, is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Bryan's Memorandum and Recommendation is hereby adopted by this Court. The Clerk shall enter this Order and provide all parties with a true copy. th - SIGNED on this the day of December, 2019, at Houston, Texas. paola, VANESSA D. GILMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Rougier v. Applied Optoelectronics, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rougier-v-applied-optoelectronics-inc-txsd-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack