Roughton v. . Sawyer

56 S.E. 480, 144 N.C. 766
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 19, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 56 S.E. 480 (Roughton v. . Sawyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roughton v. . Sawyer, 56 S.E. 480, 144 N.C. 766 (N.C. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action is brought to recover certain purchase-money from defendant lumber company and by it deposited in defendant bank. The cause was referred to a referee by tbe Court. Plaintiffs did not except to this order, and as to them it is a consent reference. They are not now entitled to a jury trial upon tbe issues arising upon tbe exceptions to referee’s report.

*767 The defendants T. 0. Morris, J. 0. Morris and C. T. Sample excepted to the order of reference, but they have waived the right to a trial by jury upon the issues of fact arising upon their exceptions filed to referee’s - report, by failing to assert such right definitely and specifically in each exception and pointing out in each exception the specific fact excepted to upon which they elect to demand a jury trial, as is required in Driller Co. v. Worth, 117 N. C., 520.

The judgment of the Superior Court is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bartlett v. Hopkins
69 S.E.2d 236 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Wynn v. . Bullock
70 S.E. 637 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1911)
Lexington Mirror Co. v. Philadelphia Casualty Co.
69 S.E. 261 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1910)
Ogden v. Appalachian Land & Lumber Co.
59 S.E. 1027 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 S.E. 480, 144 N.C. 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roughton-v-sawyer-nc-1907.